New Report Shows Immigrant Texans Held are Vital to the Food and Agriculture Industry in Texas

New research from the American Immigration Council underscores the crucial role that immigrants play in Texas' food sectors, including agriculture. The new report, From Field to Fork: The Economic Impact of Immigrants on Texas' Food Industry, was prepared in partnership with Texans for Economic Growth, a statewide 160+ member business coalition powered by the American Immigration Council. The report focuses on the state of Texas, with a spotlight on the Houston Metro Area. The report was publicly released in collaboration with multiple Texas-based partners at an event hosted by Amegy Bank. The regional event served to showcase the findings of the report and discuss the impact of immigration on Texas' food industry with local leaders. The event featured a discussion with business and civic leaders about how Texas can act on this topic.

"Texas' agriculture and food industries are a cornerstone of our state's economy, generating more than $102 billion in economic output and supporting communities across every region of Texas," says Chelsie Kramer, Texas State Organizer for the American Immigration Council and Texans for Economic Growth. "This report underscores something Texas employers and community leaders already know firsthand: immigrants are essential to keeping our food system moving. The report also highlights the reality that 14.5 percent of Texas' food workers and 13.5 percent of the state's agricultural workforce are undocumented immigrants, reinforcing that workforce stability and practical policy conversations are critical to the long-term strength and competitiveness of Texas' food economy."

"Texas restaurants are built by people who work hard, serve their neighbors and help make our communities stronger. Immigrant workers have long been part of that story, not only in restaurant kitchens and dining rooms, but across the farms, suppliers and small businesses that make our food system work," says Emily Williams Knight, Ed.D., president and CEO of the Texas Restaurant Association. "This report is an important reminder that practical workforce solutions do exist that would protect local businesses, keep food costs in check and preserve the hospitality that defines communities across Texas."

"This report provides crucial data on the essential role that immigrants play to power the American food system via Texas, from farms to restaurants," says Anne McBride, Vice President of Impact at the James Beard Foundation. "These two sectors cannot exist without the other and face similar challenges when it comes to our immigrant entrepreneurs and workers, which is why the James Beard Foundation is thrilled to partner on the release of this important work."

"This report highlights a reality Texas employers know well: immigrant workers are essential to the strength, stability, and competitiveness of our agricultural and food economy. As Texas continues to grow, maintaining a dependable workforce will remain critical to supporting our producers, businesses, and consumers alike," noted Justin Yancy, President & CEO of Texas Business Leadership Council, a statewide network of senior business leaders.

Key Findings

Across the Texas food sector, 400,500 immigrant workers make up nearly one-quarter (24.9 percent) of the workforce, contributing to industries including agriculture, food processing, food wholesale trade, food retail trade, and food services. Beyond farms and ranches, immigrants are essential across the broader food supply chain. These interconnected industries rely on immigrant labor to move food from production to consumers.

Immigrant workers in Texas hold a wide range of immigration statuses. About one-fifth of workers in the food sector are naturalized citizens, while 14.5 percent were undocumented, including 20,100 DACA-eligible individuals. The state's reliance on workers with a range of immigration statuses across the food industry means that shifts in immigration policy acutely affect workforce stability and the continuity of food production and distribution.

In 2024, agriculture, food processing, and food services generated $102.6 billion in economic output in Texas. The state exports $6.5 billion worth of agricultural commodities annually and is responsible for a sizable share of the United States' agricultural exports.

Immigrant workers fill key occupations across the food sector. They comprised 47.8 percent of miscellaneous agricultural workers, 31.7 percent of cooks, and 24.6 percent of cashiers. Farms, restaurants, and grocery stores rely on immigrants to staff key frontline positions.

In 2024, agriculture and food services generated approximately $2.7 million in GDP in the Houston Metropolitan Area, and immigrants comprised over one-third (34.3 percent) of the workforce in the food sector.

Read the full factsheet to learn more.

About the American Immigration Council

The American Immigration Council works to strengthen America by shaping how America thinks about and acts towards immigrants and immigration and by working toward a more fair and just immigration system that opens its doors to those in need of protection and unleashes the energy and skills that immigrants bring. The Council brings together problem solvers and employs four coordinated approaches to advance change — litigation, research, legislative and administrative advocacy, and communications. In January 2022, the Council and New American Economy merged to combine a broad suite of advocacy tools to better expand and protect the rights of immigrants, more fully ensure immigrants' ability to succeed economically, and help make the communities they settle in more welcoming. Follow the latest Council news and information on ImmigrationImpact.com and Twitter @immcouncil.

About Texans for Economic Growth

Texans for Economic Growth is a coalition of more than 145 Texas business leaders and associations dedicated to recognizing and supporting immigrants' positive impact on the Texas economy as business owners, taxpayers, and consumers. Upon its launch, the coalition released the Texas Compact on Immigration, a set of principles signed by more than 145 Texas business leaders and groups to guide the immigration discussion at the state and federal levels. Texans for Economic Growth supports common-sense federal immigration reforms and statewide policies that recognize the valuable contributions immigrants make to the state. Learn more at txcompact.org.

The post New Report Shows Immigrant Texans Are Vital to the Food and Agriculture Industry in Texas appeared first on American Immigration Council.

As Public Support for Mass Deportation Falls, New Proposal Seeks to Restore Credibility and Humanity in Immigration Enforcement

Washington DC, May 12 Tues – Today, the American Immigration Council released a new framework calling for the overhaul of the United States’ immigration enforcement system. The framework argues that the country’s current approach is fundamentally disconnected from public safety and has trapped the immigration debate into a false binary between either mass deportation or no enforcement at all.

Restoring Credibility and Humanity: A New Framework for Immigration Enforcement, lays out a roadmap for replacing indiscriminate mass deportation with a system focused on increasing compliance with the law, prioritizing public safety threats, proportionate consequences, and meaningful accountability for government abuse. 

Read the framework here.

The proposal comes amid growing backlash to the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda, which has swept in longtime residents, families, business owners, and people actively pursuing lawful status.

“Mass deportation has eroded public trust in the federal government by treating every immigrant as a violent criminal,” said Nayna Gupta, national policy director and co-author of the report. “A credible system should give people who want to follow the rules, a way to do so, and use consequences that are proportionate to the actual violation. The Trump administration has weaponized outdated laws that use detention and deportation as a one-size-fits-all punishment, even for people with long-standing ties who pose no public safety threat.” 

The framework proposes major reforms across four pillars: 

• Creating a new process for long-term undocumented residents to gain lawful permanent status through fines, community service, and probation-like systems instead of deportation. 
• Revising outdated laws to focus enforcement on people convicted of violent or especially serious recent crimes while professionalizing enforcement.
• Legislating new, proportionate consequences for violations of immigration law, rather than subjecting every immigration violator to detention and deportation. 
• Establishing independent oversight and stronger court authority to hold immigration agencies and agents accountable for abuses. 

The framework argues that immigration enforcement should be measured not by the number of deportations carried out, but by whether laws are enforced consistently, fairly, and humanely.  

“The whole goal when all this immigration stuff started ramping up about a year and a half ago was to get violent offenders off the street. And no one has any problem with that. The issue is you have people who are here and they are following the rules—people who are reporting to their regular check-ins and being taken into custody at those check-ins. Things like that really erode trust and really make it more dangerous for everyone out here when law enforcement can’t be trusted,” said Joseph Kennedy, sheriff of Dubuque county, Iowa. 

The framework also calls for sweeping accountability reforms, asserting that public confidence in immigration enforcement cannot be rebuilt without meaningful oversight and consequences for abuses of power. That means that agencies and agents that abuse their power should be reined in or pushed out. Among other recommendations, the proposal calls for expanding judicial authority to review unlawful enforcement actions, creating an independent immigration accountability commission, strengthening internal oversight offices within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and giving victims of civil rights violations the ability to sue. 

“Building a credible and humane immigration enforcement system depends on establishing that enforcement agencies are accountable both to the public and other branches of government,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow and co-author of the report. “No law enforcement agency can maintain legitimacy if abuses of power carry no consequences. A credible enforcement system must give courts and Congress stronger authority to intervene when federal agencies and officers abuse their authority.”

The framework warns that the U.S. has reached a critical point after decades of failed immigration policymaking that is overly focused on punishment instead of long-term compliance and public safety. According to the report, continuing down the path of indiscriminate enforcement risks locking the country into a permanent system of mass detention and social disruption. 

“We are facing a choice between indiscriminate enforcement that destabilizes communities and pulls resources away from genuine public safety threats, versus credible enforcement that is targeted, proportional, and actually capable of delivering public safety,” said Gupta. “The question is not whether immigration laws should be enforced. The question is whether enforcement will be smart, focused, and humane, or driven by fear, quotas, and political theater.” 

The full framework is available here. 

The post As Public Support for Mass Deportation Falls, New Proposal Seeks to Restore Credibility and Humanity in Immigration Enforcement appeared first on American Immigration Council.

from American Immigration Council https://ift.tt/nbKic19
via Dear ImmigrantDear Immigrant

Senate Pushes Ahead with $70 Billion More for ICE and CBP, Excluding Accountability Measures

This week, Congress moved closer to advancing legislation that would add about $70 billion in funding to immigration enforcement agencies through 2029, which is in addition to the $170 billion already provided last year. If enacted, the proposal would mark yet another circumvention of the regular government funding process—which requires bipartisan negotiations—to fund these agencies.

This funding is being pursued through the reconciliation process, which bypasses the 60-vote threshold needed in the Senate to overcome a filibuster. For the second time, congressional leaders aim to use reconciliation to fund the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and its subagencies, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Since February 14, Democrats have refused to fund ICE and CBP unless meaningful reforms, including stronger warrant requirements and professional law enforcement standards, in an attempt to rein in aggressive conduct that has resulted in multiple deaths, including of U.S. citizens. Those efforts failed.

The result is a proposal that could fund ICE and CBP for years to come, with no meaningful congressional oversight. All of this funding would be available to the agencies through the end of fiscal year 2029.

What’s in the bill?

The proposal allocates $72 billion in new funding with nearly all of it going to immigration enforcement. It includes:

• ICE: $38.2 billion to expand and sustain enforcement operations by hiring and equipping personnel across its divisions, supporting detention and removal transportation, upgrading technology and facilities, and expanding 287(g) agreements with local law enforcement. $7.5 billion of this funding is specifically earmarked for ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations for “non-immigration” purposes.
• CBP: $26 billion to hire and equip personnel, upgrade surveillance and inspection technologies, conduct screenings of unaccompanied children, and support DHS’ border enforcement mission.
• DHS: $5 billion to fund several broad purposes, including those related to the Homeland Security and Judiciary portions of the reconciliation bill passed last year, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA). In OBBBA, DHS received a similar pot of money—often referred to as a “slush” fund given its broad purpose—of $10 billion. DHS has used those funds in legally suspect ways, including to cover DHS employees’ salaries during the government shutdown.
• Department of Justice (DOJ): $1.5 billion for a variety of purposes, including enforcing and administering federal immigration laws under the DOJ’s authority.

How does this compare to previous ICE and CBP budgets?

ICE and CBP are already among the most highly-funded law enforcement agencies in the federal government. In recent years, Congress has increased funding to both agencies through its annual appropriations process at the expense of agencies that process immigration benefits. Nevertheless, this proposal, especially combined with last year’s reconciliation bill, represents a historically high increase in immigration enforcement funding.

The proposal is nearly four times ICE’s annual budget from FY 2025. Combined with the $75 billion ICE already received last year through OBBBA, the agency will have received over eleven times its 2025 budget. While the funds can be used through 2029, the Congressional Budget Office notes that there is considerable uncertainty over the pace of spending given the lack of guardrails on when the money can be spent. 

This is a big concern, as ICE received $45 billion for detention through OBBBA to be used through 2029 but instead decided to use the overwhelming majority ($38 billion) of it immediately to convert warehouses into immigration detention centers. At a recent conference in Arizona, a DHS official in charge of spending funding from OBBBA said that the agency was on track to “obligate 75% of the funds” by the end of September this year.

Similarly, CBP, which would receive funding for its border operations in this proposal, would receive 3.5 times its 2025 budget. Again, this funding is available until 2029, but there are no proposed constraints on it being used sooner.

In addition, DHS would receive $5 billion beyond its annually appropriated amount to fund broad categories of priorities, including immigration-related provisions of last year’s OBBBA. The administration has so far been able to rely on its own interpretations when deciding how to use similar funds provided under the OBBBA.

What makes this particularly concerning is not just the amount—but the structure. By using the reconciliation process, Congress would effectively provide multi-year, lump-sum funding with fewer mechanisms for oversight or course correction. In contrast, the annual appropriations process allows lawmakers to revisit funding levels each year, adjust priorities, and impose conditions on how funds are spent.

What’s being foregone to fund immigration enforcement at these levels?

The tradeoffs here are significant. By channeling such a large share of federal resources into immigration enforcement—through a process that minimizes oversight—congressional leaders are also choosing not to invest those funds elsewhere.

In April, the Trump administration submitted its funding priorities for FY 2027. While lawmakers are considering giving billions more to ICE and CBP, the White House has proposed massive cuts to essential domestic programs. $70 billion could instead fund:

• Biomedical research for 4 years
• Student higher education grants for 5 years
• Energy assistance for low-income households (LIHEAP) for 6 years.
• Job Corps, a workforce development program, for 14 years
• Pre-school development grants for 73 years
• Rural health programs for 242 years

Instead, taxpayer dollars are being directed away from helping people meet basic needs and toward further expanding immigration enforcement infrastructure.

What does this mean for the future of immigration enforcement funding?

This isn’t just a debate about funding levels—it’s a debate about Congress’ priorities. Reconciliation was never designed to serve as the primary vehicle for shaping complex, long-term policy in areas like immigration enforcement. Unlike the traditional government funding process, reconciliation lacks many of the guardrails that require agencies to report their activity, provide members of Congress access to detention facilities, or operate certain programs.

Should Congress commit $70 billion to expand federal enforcement capacity with fewer checks, fewer reporting requirements, and less flexibility to respond to changing conditions? That’s the choice this bill presents.

The Senate is expected to vote on the bill during the third week of May.

The post Senate Pushes Ahead with $70 Billion More for ICE and CBP, Excluding Accountability Measures appeared first on American Immigration Council.

from American Immigration Council https://ift.tt/91VPLm7
via Dear ImmigrantDear Immigrant

Dear Immigrant: Money Will Surprise You

Letter 05

Re: Money Will Surprise You

Dear Immigrant,

The salary looks large until you learn what it costs to live inside it. This is the most common financial shock of immigration and it is almost universally underestimated, because the people who told you about the salary told you the number without telling you what the number becomes after the country takes its share.

Tax will take approximately twenty to thirty percent depending on your bracket and your location. Rent will take thirty to forty percent of what remains. Transport, food, utilities, insurance, phone — these costs are not optional and they are higher than you expect. What remains after these fixed costs, in most immigrant stories I know, is smaller than the person imagined when they made the decision to come.

The financial shock is not a reason not to come. It is a reason to arrive with accurate information rather than the number on the job offer. The number on the job offer is not your money. It is the starting point of a subtraction problem. Know what the answer to that problem is before you commit to a lifestyle that assumes the starting number.

Build a budget in the first week. Not a theoretical budget — an actual one, based on the actual costs of the actual place you have arrived in. Find out what rent costs in your area. Find out what the tax rate is. Find out what a monthly transit pass costs. Add these up. What remains is what you have to work with. Plan from that number, not from the number on the offer letter.

Send money home only after you have covered your own costs. This sounds obvious and it is one of the most violated principles in immigrant financial life. You cannot fund two households on an entry-level salary. Decide what you can send, set it as a fixed amount, and hold it steady. The people back home will adjust their expectations if you set them clearly and early.

Financial discipline in the first two years determines the trajectory of the next ten. This is the part that feels like restriction. It is actually construction.

From someone who learned this the expensive way,
A former immigrant

dearimmigrant.com

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — essays across five properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com

Dear Immigrant: I Went Back for a Year

Dear Immigrant, I went back. Not to stay — to wait. My wife needed a spousal visa, and the process required one of us to be in Kenya while it moved through the system. I had been in America for fifteen years. Fourteen of those years I called myself a Kenyan immigrant in America. This year I was something else — an American in Kenya, or something in between.

What I want to tell you is this: the country you came from is not static. It moved while you were away. Kenya's Gen Z has built a political consciousness in the last two years that I did not leave with. The infrastructure of Nairobi is different — there are expressways now, better connections, more high-rises in what were once open lots. But the cost of living increased faster than any of the infrastructure. The debt crisis that the Finance Bill was trying to address is real. The youth who marched against it were right that the solution being proposed would hurt them. They were also right that the institution was not listening.

You will go back someday. The country you go back to will not be the one you left.

Data: Eligible Immigrant Voters Play a Key Role in Elections in Hundreds of Swing Districts

Analysis of 284 congressional districts highlights immigrants’ role in shaping close races 

April 16, Washington DC — A new analysis from the American Immigration Council finds that millions of immigrant voters who are U.S. citizens are a central part of the electorate across 284 congressional districts where elections will take place this year. 

The analysis on voting data reflects eligible and registered voters only. Under federal law, only U.S. citizens can vote in federal elections. 

Drawing on the latest available data from the 2024 American Community Survey, the analysis shows that immigrants account for nearly one in five residents across the districts studied. They play a significant role in the workforce, tax base, and local economies that shape voters’ priorities. 

Key findings include:  

• U.S. citizens who are immigrants are poised to play a key role in close elections. There are an estimated 16 million registered immigrant voters (that is, naturalized U.S. citizens eligible and registered to vote) across the districts analyzed. In 44 percent of these districts (126 of 284), the number of eligible immigrant voters exceeds the margin of victory in the 2024 elections. 

• For example, in Florida’s 25th congressional district there are an estimated 135,500 immigrant voters. The district flipped from GOP to Democratic control in 2022 and the Democrats won again in 2024 by a narrow margin of victory of 30,700 votes. 

• In New Jersey’s 9th district, Democrats won by just over 12,600 votes in 2024. There are nearly 165,000 immigrants there who are U.S. citizens age 18 and above and thus eligible to vote.   

• Language and outreach matter. On average, 83.1 percent of immigrants speak a language other than English at home, highlighting the importance of outreach that reflects the diversity of communities in these districts. 

• Immigrants are a major part of local communities. On average, immigrants make up nearly 20 percent of residents across the 284 districts analyzed, and in some districts, they represent more than half of the population. 

“Immigrant voters who are U.S. citizens are a meaningful part of the electorate in many communities, especially in close races,” said Nan Wu, director of research at the American Immigration Council. “Like other voters, they care about jobs, housing, and the economy, and they are deeply embedded in the communities they help sustain.” 

The analysis also underscores that immigrants’ influence extends beyond elections. Across the districts studied, immigrants help drive economic growth, support key industries, and shape the issues that dominate elections, from inflation and housing to workforce shortages. 

Taken together, the findings show that immigrants are not a niche population, but a core part of the communities, economies, and electorate that define many congressional districts.

The post Data: Eligible Immigrant Voters Play a Key Role in Elections in Hundreds of Swing Districts appeared first on American Immigration Council.

from American Immigration Council https://ift.tt/26krpdj
via Dear ImmigrantDear Immigrant

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — 34 essays across 5 properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com

New Report: Immigrants Power Ohio’s Workforce and Pay Billions in Taxes

Immigrants in Ohio earned $27.3 billion in income and paid $7.3 billion in local, state, and federal taxes in 2023. New research from the American Immigration Council underscores the crucial role that immigrants play in Ohio's economy, filling jobs in critical industries, strengthening the workforce, and contributing billions in taxes each year. The new report was prepared in partnership with Ohio Business for Immigration Solutions — a statewide business coalition powered by the American Immigration Council with over 100 members.

"Immigrants are essential to Ohio's future, powering the state's workforce, strengthening critical industries, and paying billions in taxes that communities depend on every day," said Rich André, Director of State and Local Initiatives at the American Immigration Council.

"Ohio's workforce shortages are placing real strain on businesses across the state, and as this new report highlights, immigrants play a vital role in driving economic growth and sustaining Ohio's future," said Jaclyn Ringstmeier, Executive Director of the Greater Medina Chamber of Commerce.

Key findings:

Immigrants are helping fill Ohio's workplace shortages and will help meet future needs. From 2019 to 2024, the number of overall online job postings increased by 8.2 percent. In 2023, 75.5 percent of immigrants were active in the labor force. That same year, immigrants were 29.4 percent more likely to be of working age than their U.S.-born counterparts — demonstrating that immigrants are already meeting a growing demand for workers and are poised to continue to be active contributors to the workforce.

Immigrants in Ohio contributed billions in taxes and consumer spending. In 2023, immigrants earned $27.3 billion in income and paid $7.3 billion in taxes, leaving $20 billion in spending power that supports local businesses and communities. That spending by immigrant households helps fuel growth and keeps local economic corridors vibrant.

Immigrants are uniquely positioned to meet critical multilingual needs in the workforce. From 2019 to 2024, the number of online job postings that required or prioritized bilingual skills in Ohio increased by 39.2 percent. Immigrants often have multilingual skills, enabling them to fill those positions.

Ohio is underutilizing its immigrant talent. Many immigrants with specialized training and skills gained abroad are unable to work in their fields, due to barriers like relicensing and language proficiency. As a result, in 2023, 43.7 percent of immigrants with a college education were working in jobs that did not require a college degree.

Read the full factsheet to learn more about how immigrants are supporting Ohio's workforce, tax base, and economic growth.

About the American Immigration Council

The American Immigration Council works to create a more welcoming and fair immigration system. Through litigation, research, and programs that expand access to legal assistance, the Council helps ensure immigrants are embraced, communities are enriched, and justice prevails for all. Follow us on BlueSky @immcouncil.org and Instagram @immcouncil.

About Ohio Business for Immigration Solutions

Ohio Business for Immigration Solutions (OBIS) is a coalition of more than 100 Ohio businesses, trade associations, chambers of commerce, and economic development groups that believe modernizing our immigration system is critically important for the growth of the state's economy. Upon its launch, the coalition released the Ohio Compact on Immigration, a set of principles developed to elevate the Ohio business community's desire to promote immigration reforms that will strengthen the economy, attract and retain global talent, and bring new businesses to the Buckeye State. OBIS supports sensible public policy solutions that rise above partisanship and rhetoric and meet the challenges of the current immigration system while recognizing the valuable contributions immigrants make to the state.

Start Here — All 28 Letters in Order

dearimmigrant.com

Twenty-Eight Letters to the Immigrant

From someone who crossed to someone who is about to. The paperwork, the first winter, the money that surprises you, what homesickness actually is, what the country owes you, and what you owe the people back home.

READ IN ORDER — 28 LETTERS

01	Before You Pack
02	The Paperwork Is the First Test
03	What the Visa Does Not Give You
04	The First Winter
05	Money Will Surprise You (not yet published)
06	Call Home, But Know What Calling Costs (not yet published)
07	The Job Is Not the Life (not yet published)
08	Nobody Is Coming to Help You (not yet published)
09	Build Your Own People (not yet published)
10	What Homesickness Actually Is (not yet published)
11	The Language Inside the Language (not yet published)
12	Do Not Perform Success (not yet published)
13	The Body Keeps Score (not yet published)
14	What You Owe the People Back Home (not yet published)
15	The System Is Not Your Enemy (not yet published)
16	Your Degree Is a Starting Point (not yet published)
17	Silence Can Be Intelligent (not yet published)
18	Find One Thing That Is Only Yours (not yet published)
19	The Five-Year Mark (not yet published)
20	When You Think About Going Back (not yet published)
21	What Integration Actually Means (not yet published)
22	The Second Generation (not yet published)
23	You Will Change Whether You Want To or Not (not yet published)
24	The Friends You Make Abroad (not yet published)
25	What the Country Owes You (not yet published)
26	Build Something That Lasts (not yet published)
27	The Letter You Will Write Someday (not yet published)
28	Dear Immigrant (not yet published)

dearimmigrant.com

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — 34 essays across 5 properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com

Dear Immigrant: The First Winter

Letter 04

Re: The First Winter

Dear Immigrant,

If you are going somewhere with winter, the first winter will be unlike anything you have experienced. I do not mean this only in the obvious sense of the cold, though the cold is real and it is more total than you have imagined. I mean it in the sense that winter will reorganize your interior life in ways you have not prepared for.

In winter in the northern hemisphere, the sun sets in the early afternoon. You will leave work in the dark. You will wake in the dark. The days will be short and grey and the cold will make going outside a transaction rather than a habit. The world will contract to the distance between the places you must go. You will spend more time alone than you have ever spent in your life.

The combination of isolation and darkness and cold produces something in immigrants that I have heard described many ways — as depression, as homesickness, as culture shock — but that I think of simply as the body registering an absence. You have left a place that had warmth and density and the constant presence of people who knew you. The winter makes that absence physical. You feel it in your chest when you walk outside. You feel it at four pm when the sky goes dark and you are not yet home.

Some things help: finding a community — a church, a cultural association, a sports team, anything that puts you regularly in the presence of people who will eventually know your name. Maintaining a physical routine. Getting outside even when it is cold, because the light, however thin, is better than the absence of light. Cooking food that connects you to somewhere warm.

The winter ends. They all end. But the first one is long, and I want you to know it is coming and to prepare your interior for it, not just your wardrobe.

From someone who made it through several winters,
A former immigrant

dearimmigrant.com

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — essays across five properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com

Supreme Court Today: Immigration Advocates Tell Justices Trump’s Turnback Policy Violated Law

Thousands denied the right to seek asylum and forced back into danger; case has implications for refugee rights.

Immigration advocates argued before the Supreme Court that the Trump administration's turnback policy violated federal immigration law. Under the now-defunct policy, immigration officers at official border crossings physically and indefinitely blocked people seeking safety from setting foot on U.S. soil, flouting their legal responsibility to inspect and process those requesting asylum.

"For more than 45 years, Congress has guaranteed people arriving at our borders the right to seek asylum, consistent with our international treaty obligations," said Kelsi Corkran, Supreme Court Director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, who argued the case. "Yet this Administration believes that Congress gave it discretion to completely ignore those requirements, and turn back those who are seeking refuge from persecution at its whim. Nothing in the law supports that result."

The turnback policy, euphemistically dubbed "metering" by government officials, broke with longstanding practice and violated the law. It denied thousands the right to seek asylum, forcing them to languish in hazardous conditions in Mexico or return to the peril they had fled. In 2017, Al Otro Lado, a binational organization that provides free legal and humanitarian aid to immigrants, and a group of asylum seekers brought a class action suit challenging the policy, which the courts ruled unlawful in both 2022 and 2024. Although the turnback policy has not been in effect since 2021, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to overturn the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision declaring the policy unlawful.

"The right to seek asylum is not a policy preference or a loophole — it is a promise to human beings in their most desperate hour, a promise forged after the world witnessed the horrors of the Holocaust and said 'never again'. Seeking asylum is not like taking a number at a deli counter and waiting for your turn," said Nicole Elizabeth Ramos, Border Rights Project Director at Al Otro Lado, plaintiff in the case. "The people turned away at our border are fleeing rape, torture, kidnapping, and death threats. You cannot tell families running for their lives to go back and wait in danger because their suffering is inconvenient. We brought this case because the United States made a legal and moral commitment to protect people fleeing persecution. The question before the Court is whether that promise still means something — or whether it can be discarded when it becomes politically uncomfortable."

For over a century, under our immigration laws, government officials have been required to inspect people seeking asylum who present themselves at designated ports of entry along the U.S.-Mexico border — as they must inspect all noncitizens seeking admission to the United States. This requirement ensures that the U.S. government does not send vulnerable people back to danger without giving them an opportunity to seek protection.

"The government's turnback policy ran roughshod over our laws and treaty obligations. It fueled chaos and dysfunction at the southern border. And it was a complete humanitarian catastrophe, returning thousands of vulnerable refugees to grave harm," said Melissa Crow, Director of Litigation at the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies. "For far too many, the turnback policy was a death sentence. We are here at the Supreme Court today for them, and for all people who continue to look to the United States as a beacon of hope, as a place where the persecuted may find safe haven. We will never stop fighting for the rights of people seeking safety at our nation's doorstep."

"We hope the Court rejects the administration's cynical attempt to manipulate the meaning of the border to evade the most fundamental protections of international law and to continue to exile vulnerable asylum seekers," said Baher Azmy, Legal Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. "Our humanitarian treaty obligations, forged out of the horrors of WWII, are too important to suffer from the whims of CBP."

"President Trump's effort to abandon asylum seekers fleeing dangerous circumstances in fear for their lives is an unlawful overreach that imperils thousands of people — including children — in dire circumstances," said Skye Perryman, President and CEO of Democracy Forward. "Democracy Forward is proud to work with these brave plaintiffs and our partners to protect the rights of people seeking asylum."

"The Trump administration's illegal turnback policy has flouted both U.S. and international law, all while creating massive dysfunction at our southern border," said Rebecca Cassler, Senior Litigation Attorney at the American Immigration Council. "But most importantly, we cannot forget the people at the heart of this case — the hundreds of thousands of vulnerable asylum seekers who were sent back to danger, and in some cases, death. They deserve justice most of all."

Al Otro Lado provides holistic legal and humanitarian support to refugees, deportees, and other migrants in the U.S. and Tijuana through a multidisciplinary, client-centered, harm reduction-based practice. They engage in individual representation, human rights monitoring, medical-legal partnerships, and impact litigation to protect the rights of immigrants and people seeking asylum.

The American Immigration Council works to strengthen America by shaping how America thinks about and acts towards immigrants and immigration and by working toward a more fair and just immigration system that opens its doors to those in need of protection and unleashes the energy and skills that immigrants bring. The Council brings together problem solvers and employs four coordinated approaches to advance change — litigation, research, legislative and administrative advocacy, and communications.

The Center for Gender & Refugee Studies defends the human rights of courageous refugees seeking asylum in the United States. With strategic focus and unparalleled legal expertise, CGRS champions the most challenging cases, fights for due process, and promotes policies that deliver safety and justice for refugees.

The Center for Constitutional Rights works with communities under threat to fight for justice and liberation through litigation, advocacy, and strategic communications. Since 1966, the Center for Constitutional Rights has taken on oppressive systems of power, including structural racism, gender oppression, economic inequity, and governmental overreach.

The Democracy Forward Foundation is a national legal organization that advances democracy and social progress through litigation, policy, public education, and regulatory engagement.

The Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection is a non-partisan, public interest organization within Georgetown Law. ICAP engages in litigation, policy, and public education to defend constitutional rights and protect our democratic processes.

Federal Court Blocks Significant Pieces of Administration’s Sweeping Immigration Appeals Rule That Eliminates Meaningful Judicial Review

Order Halts Implementation of Dangerous Steps that Would Have Dismantled Safeguards at the Board of Immigration Appeals

Washington, D.C. — The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order late last night in Amica Center for Immigrant Rights et al. v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al., blocking significant pieces of the Trump-Vance administration's new policy that sought to eliminate meaningful appellate review before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Plaintiffs in the case include Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, Brooklyn Defender Services, Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project, HIAS, and National Immigrant Justice Center. Democracy Forward, the American Immigration Council, and National Immigrant Justice Center represent the plaintiffs.

The lawsuit and motion for preliminary relief challenge an Interim Final Rule (IFR), "Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals," which was set to take effect immediately. The IFR would have imposed sweeping changes that would have eviscerated noncitizens' right to appeal decisions in their immigration cases. Those changes, now blocked, include: reducing the time to file most appeals from 30 days to 10 days; requiring summary dismissal of appeals unless a majority of permanent BIA members vote within 10 days to accept the case for review; and permitting dismissal decisions before transcripts are created or records are transmitted.

"At a time when the due process rights of immigrants are under attack, this ruling prevents the BIA from reaching the point of near self-destruction," said Emilie Raber, Senior Attorney at the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights. "We hope that this decision is the first step of many steps in ensuring that immigration courts reach decisions based on the law rather than on pre-determined outcomes."

"Today's ruling preserves a vital avenue for judicial review in removal proceedings," said Lucas Marquez, Director of Civil Rights & Law Reform at Brooklyn Defender Services, "and reminds government agencies to follow proper procedures when attempting to make sweeping changes to regulations."

"This ruling keeps in place a basic, yet critical, protection for immigrants facing removal: the ability to appeal their case," said Laura St. John, Legal Director at the Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project. "As the administration continues to try to deport as many people as they can quickly and often without a fair day in court, it is critical for everyone to have the opportunity to file an appeal. Without this decision, countless immigrants with valid claims would have been hurriedly deported to dangerous conditions, forsaking due process for efficiency."

"Today, the court has again held the federal government to its foundational responsibility to afford basic fairness and due process to all whose rights it seeks to curtail," said Stephen Brown, Director of Immigration Legal Services at HIAS. "We are grateful to our counsel in this case, and proud to stand with our co-plaintiffs to work for a fair immigration system."

"Today's ruling is an important win in the face of an administration that is intent on dismantling our immigration system at any cost, including betraying our country's shared values of the importance of due process and access to counsel," said Mary Georgevich, Senior Litigation Attorney at the National Immigrant Justice Center. "While imperfect, the Board of Immigration Appeals is the body that Congress has mandated to review deportation orders when the immigration courts get it wrong. Allowing the Trump administration's reckless proposal to block immigrants from a fair opportunity for review of bad decisions would have resulted in people being returned to danger and families unjustly separated, all to serve a racist mass deportation agenda. We are grateful the court seemed to see this proposed rule for what it was and is ruling to uphold both due process and rule of law."

"Today's decision makes it clear that the Trump-Vance administration cannot play games with the immigration appeals system to eliminate basic due process and fast-track deportations," said Erez Reuveni, Senior Counsel at Democracy Forward, who presented the oral argument. "Once again, no matter how hard this administration tries to hide its cruel and unlawful actions behind an 'immigration policy,' a federal court has made clear that the government must follow the law and cannot strip people of their basic rights. This is another demonstration that litigation is powerful. We will continue representing our plaintiffs in court to defend their rights and hold this administration accountable."

"This order protects a critical safeguard in our immigration system: the ability to appeal a court decision," said Suchita Mathur, Senior Litigation Attorney at the American Immigration Council. "This rule would have led to the rushed deportations of untold people before their cases could even be properly reviewed. Today's decision helps protect basic fairness in our immigration courts."

The IFR was issued without the required notice-and-comment rulemaking period and fundamentally restructures appellate review in removal proceedings. By requiring summary dismissal unless the full Board acts within 10 days — before transcripts are created — the rule makes meaningful review functionally impossible in most cases.

The legal team at Democracy Forward includes Erez Reuveni, Allyson Scher, Catherine Carroll, and Robin Thurston. Counsel at American Immigration Council include Michelle Lapointe and Suchi Mathur.

The post Federal Court Blocks Significant Pieces of Administration's Sweeping Immigration Appeals Rule That Eliminates Meaningful Judicial Review appeared first on American Immigration Council.

Dear Immigrant: What the Visa Does Not Give You

Letter 03

Re: What the Visa Does Not Give You

Dear Immigrant,

The visa gives you permission to be present. It does not give you belonging, safety, stability, or the right to be treated with dignity. Those things are separate from the visa and some of them are not guaranteed by anything.

I want to be precise about what legal status gives you and what it does not, because the conflation of the two — the assumption that the visa solves the problem rather than simply opening a door — is one of the most common and most damaging misunderstandings I have seen immigrants carry.

Legal status means the government has agreed to let you be here under certain conditions. It does not mean the society has agreed to welcome you. It does not mean your employer will treat you fairly, your landlord will maintain your apartment, your colleagues will include you, your neighbors will acknowledge you. These things happen or they do not happen based on the specific people involved and the specific conditions of the place you have arrived in. The visa is not a guarantee of any of them.

The gap between legal permission to be present and actual belonging is the gap you will spend years trying to close. Some immigrants close it. Some do not, and not because they failed but because the society they arrived in was not structured to receive them fully. Both outcomes are possible. The visa does not determine which one.

Know what you have when you have the visa. Know what you still need to build. The visa is the beginning of the work, not the completion of it.

The door is open. What is behind it is still to be determined.

From the other side of several doors,
A former immigrant

dearimmigrant.com

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — essays across five properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com

Legal Groups Sue to Block Rule Gutting Immigration Appeals

Emergency Filing Seeks Court Order to Halt Implementation of Interim Final Rule that Dismantles Safeguards at the Board of Immigration Appeals

Washington, D.C. — The American Immigration Council and a coalition of other legal groups, including the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, Brooklyn Defender Services, Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project, HIAS, and National Immigrant Justice Center, filed a lawsuit and emergency motion to block a new interim final rule issued by the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) that would effectively eliminate meaningful appellate review before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenges the Interim Final Rule (IFR) titled Appellate Procedures for the Board of Immigration Appeals, which is set to take effect shortly. As detailed in the complaint, the IFR imposes sweeping changes that would eviscerate noncitizens' right to appeal decisions in their immigration cases, including: Reduce the time to file most appeals from 30 days to 10 days; Require summary dismissal of appeals unless a majority of permanent BIA members vote within 10 days to accept the case for review; Permit dismissal decisions before transcripts are created or records are transmitted; Impose simultaneous 20-day briefing schedules with extensions allowed only in narrow "exceptional circumstances"; Eliminate reply briefs unless specifically invited; and Impose rigid case completion deadlines and concentrate decision-making authority in agency leadership.

"The BIA Interim Final Rule makes a mockery of due process. In addition to taking away virtually any benefit the BIA could provide immigrants, it will wreak havoc on people with cases in immigration court or federal appellate courts," said Emilie Raber, Senior Attorney at the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights. "Litigants who are children, are detained, do not have a lawyer, have disabilities, or speak rare languages will be disproportionately harmed by this Interim Final Rule."

"The Interim Final Rule creates a barrier to appellate review in removal proceedings and strikes at the heart of due process," said Lucas Marquez, Director of Civil Rights & Law Reform at Brooklyn Defender Services. "The Rule will result in the deportation of people who are eligible for immigration relief — people who have valid legal claims that an immigration judge got it wrong — simply because the Board of Immigration Appeals will no longer be an avenue to fairly review their cases."

"This interim final rule completely decimates the process to appeal a case in front of the BIA," said Laura St. John, Legal Director at the Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project. "It will render the vast majority of immigrants unable to appeal their cases and will be particularly harmful to those who most need the recourse of an appeal process, including pro se litigants, vulnerable children, Indigenous language speakers, and people in immigration detention. It will be nearly impossible for most detained pro se individuals to submit a notice of appeal in just 10 days, and without the ability to appeal, many people will be unjustly deported back to dangerous or even life-threatening conditions."

"Our clients deserve a fair chance in the immigration court system," said Stephen Brown, Director of Immigration Legal Services at HIAS. "Without access to a meaningful appeal process, people who have fled persecution and violence could face dangerous consequences, including the risk of being sent back to a place that is not safe for them. We are proud to join this legal challenge, and to take a stand against a policy change that will have seismic impact on the ability of legal service providers such as HIAS to support immigrants in navigating a complex and ever-changing legal system."

"It is hard to overstate the potential human toll of the changes proposed in this rule," said Lisa Koop, director of legal services at the National Immigrant Justice Center, which is co-counsel and an organizational plaintiff in the lawsuit. "Curtailing due process in this manner guarantees that legal services providers like ours will be less able to help our clients defend against unjust deportation, and many people who would otherwise be eligible for asylum or other legal status in the United States will never have the opportunity to pursue protection under our laws."

According to the filings, the IFR was issued without the required notice-and-comment rulemaking period and fundamentally restructures appellate review in removal proceedings. Plaintiffs argue that by requiring summary dismissal unless the full Board acts within 10 days — before transcripts are created — the rule makes meaningful review functionally impossible in most cases.

Plaintiffs argue the rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the Fifth Amendment, which protects people from deprivation of liberty without due process of law. They are asking the court to block the rule's effective date and prevent implementation while the case proceeds. The organizations are seeking preliminary relief to prevent the rule from taking effect and to keep it blocked while the litigation proceeds.

The case is Amica Center for Immigrant Rights v. EOIR.

View the complaint here. View the stay motion here.

The post Legal Groups Sue to Block Rule Gutting Immigration Appeals appeared first on American Immigration Council.

---

Dear Immigrant ◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026. The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — 34 essays across 5 properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series → gabrielmahia.com

How to Reclaim Your Lost Canadian Citizenship Under Bill C-3

Many people around the world may now qualify for Canadian citizenship because of recent changes to Canadian law. Bill C-3 corrects past citizenship rules and allows many individuals to reclaim citizenship that was previously lost or denied.

The post How to Reclaim Your Lost Canadian Citizenship Under Bill C-3 appeared first on Canadim.

from Canadim https://ift.tt/CAtYflh
via Dear ImmigrantDear Immigrant

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — 34 essays across 5 properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com

Dear Immigrant: The Paperwork Is the First Test

Letter 02

Re: The Paperwork Is the First Test

Dear Immigrant,

The first thing the new country will ask of you is not your skills, not your intelligence, not your character. It will ask for documents. The right documents, in the right order, submitted to the right office by the right deadline, accompanied by the right fee. This is the first test and it is not a test of anything you were trained for.

The paperwork is designed for people who already understand the system — who know which form follows which form, which office handles which application, what the difference between a received receipt and an approved receipt means for your status. If you do not already know these things, you will learn them the way immigrants always learn them: by making mistakes and by asking people who made mistakes before you.

The paperwork is not fair. It is deliberately complex in ways that advantage people with resources — people who can pay lawyers, who have time to navigate bureaucracies, who speak the administrative language of the country fluently. If you do not have these advantages, the system will be harder for you. This is not an accident. Immigration systems are designed to filter. You are being filtered. Knowing this does not make it easier, but it makes it less personal.

Find the organizations that help immigrants navigate the paperwork. They exist in most cities. They are usually underfunded and oversubscribed. Use them anyway. The people who work there have seen your situation before and they know things that you do not know yet.

Keep copies of everything. Every document you submit, every receipt you receive, every letter they send you. Keep them in a folder. Keep the folder somewhere you will not lose it. Your administrative record is your legal existence in the new country. Treat it accordingly.

The paperwork will end. The life will continue. Get through the paperwork.

From someone who learned to keep better records,
A former immigrant

dearimmigrant.com

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — essays across five properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com

What to Expect from Canada Immigration in 2026

Canadian immigration is already changing, with new policies and rule updates introduced earlier this year. It comes as no surprise that the start of a new year has brought changes in how people can come to Canada, stay in Canada, and become permanent residents or citizens. Although some Canadian immigration pathways have become more limited, others are expanding depending on who you are and where you are coming from.

The post What to Expect from Canada Immigration in 2026 appeared first on Canadim.

from Canadim https://ift.tt/QE9jVKJ
via Dear ImmigrantDear Immigrant

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — 34 essays across 5 properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com

Report: Immigration Detention Is Bigger, Harsher, and Less Accountable Than Ever

Trump Administration Targets People with No Criminal Record and Uses Detention to Pressure Them to Give Up Their Cases 

Washington DC, Jan. 14 Wednesday — A new report released today by the American Immigration Council shows that the Trump administration is locking up hundreds of thousands of people— most with no criminal record—into a harsh immigration detention system that makes it near impossible to fight their cases or secure release.  

READ THE REPORT HERE.

The report, Immigration Detention Expansion in Trump’s Second Term, reveals how historic funding increases and aggressive enforcement tactics have pushed immigration detention to the highest level in U.S. history. Rather than addressing serious public safety threats, the government is spending billions on mass detention to pressure people who pose no threat to give up their cases and accept deportation. 

As the Trump administration expands its mass deportation agenda, the consequences extend far beyond detention centers. DHS’s aggressive tactics during large-scale enforcement actions in American neighborhoods around the country have already led to tragic, preventable deaths, revealing the human cost of an immigration enforcement system that operates with little oversight or accountability. 

“This has absolutely nothing to do with law and order. Under mass deportation, we’re seeing the construction of a mass immigration detention system on a scale the United States has never seen, in which people with no criminal record are routinely locked up with no clear path to release,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council. “Over the next three years, billions of more dollars will be poured into a detention system that is on track to rival the entire federal criminal prison system. The goal is not public safety, but to pressure people into giving up their rights and accepting deportation.” 

READ THE REPORT HERE.

According to the report, the number of people held in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention rose nearly 75 percent in 2025, climbing from roughly 40,000 at the start of the year to 66,000 by the start of December, the highest level ever recorded. And with Congress authorizing $45 billion dollars in new detention funding, the report warns that the system could more than triple in size over the next four years. 

Major findings of the report include: 

• There is a dramatic shift in who is being detained. Arrests of people with no criminal record surged by 2,450 percent in Trump’s first year, driven by increases in tactics like “at-large” arrests, roving patrols, worksite raids, and re-arrests of people attending immigration court hearings or ICE check-ins. The percent of people arrested by ICE and held in detention with no criminal record rose from 6 percent in January to 41 percent by December. 

• The detention system has expanded so rapidly that already deleterious conditions have worsened. Through the start of December, ICE was using over 100 more facilities to detain immigrants than at the start of the year. For the first time ever, thousands of immigrants arrested in the interior are being detained in hastily-constructed tent camps, where conditions are brutal. More people died in ICE detention in 2025 than in the last four years combined. 

• People are stripped of their chance to ask a judge for release. New policies have made prolonged, indefinite detention the norm. The Trump administration is pursuing policies that strip millions of people, if they are detained, of the right to have a bond hearing where they can make a case to be released into their community while their immigration case is under review, including for those with decades of life in the United States.  

• The administration is using detention to drive up deportations. By November 2025, for every person released from ICE detention, more than fourteen were deported directly from custody. This is compared to an approximate one-to-two ratio from a year earlier.   

• As the administration expands detention, it is simultaneously gutting oversight. The rapid growth of detention has been paired with deep cuts to internal watchdogs and new restrictions on congressional inspections. This erosion of oversight has consequences that extend beyond detention facilities themselves: as ICE is operating with fewer checks on its authority, aggressive interior enforcement in cities has led to preventable harm and deaths, underscoring how a lack of accountability is putting lives at risk.  

“The Trump administration continues to falsely claim it’s going after the ‘worst of the worst,’ but public safety is just a pretext for locking up immigrants and pushing them to abdicate their cases.,” said Nayna Gupta, policy director at the American Immigration Council. “Horrific conditions inside detention facilities break people into accepting deportation which fuels the administration’s inhumane deportation quotas and goals.” 

The report profiles three people whose experiences illustrate the real-world impact of this historic expansion of detention: 

• A permanent residency holder and father of two, detained by ICE at an airport because of a past conviction he was told would not jeopardize his legal status. ICE then neglected his medical issues for months while he was detained. 

• An asylum seeker who was granted humanitarian protection by an immigration judge, yet remains detained months later, without explanation, as ICE seeks to deport her to a third country, and who says she was treated better in federal prison when serving time for an immigration offense.  

• A DACA recipient, detained following a criminal arrest, who was transferred repeatedly across the country as ICE searched for available bed space and witnessed consistently poor conditions across multiple different detention centers. 

With billions of additional dollars already approved, the report warns that immigration detention is poised to grow even larger, deepening the human, legal, and financial costs for families, communities, and the country as a whole. 

“This is a system built to produce deportations, not justice,” said Reichlin-Melnick. “When detention becomes the default response to immigration cases, the costs are borne by everyone. Families are torn apart, due process is set aside, and billions of taxpayer dollars are wasted on these unnecessary and cruel policies that do nothing to increase public safety.”

The post Report: Immigration Detention Is Bigger, Harsher, and Less Accountable Than Ever  appeared first on American Immigration Council.

from American Immigration Council https://ift.tt/zKdeWlT
via Dear ImmigrantDear Immigrant

◆ YEAR IN KENYA SERIES

This essay is part of the Year in Kenya series — twelve months in Nairobi, April 2025 to April 2026.

The analytical home for the series is gabrielmahia.com, where Gabriel writes on power, institutions, and what holds under pressure. The full reading order — 34 essays across 5 properties — is at the Year in Kenya series page.

Read the Series →gabrielmahia.com